Fantastic answers, Sarah. The journal discussion, while promising and definitely interesting, is again too brief to give a full account of your moral background/ the origins of morality. It’s worth referring to the journal criteria sheet and it’s prompts to assist in exploring the issues in more depth. Part of the challenge to is generate ‘problems’ for yourself to solve / discuss during the entry – in philosophy, it’s actually valuable to create difficulties that might not be obvious to the casual observer.
This entry was posted on March 7, 2008 at 12:57 am and is filed under Uncategorized.You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Fantastic answers, Sarah. The journal discussion, while promising and definitely interesting, is again too brief to give a full account of your moral background/ the origins of morality. It’s worth referring to the journal criteria sheet and it’s prompts to assist in exploring the issues in more depth. Part of the challenge to is generate ‘problems’ for yourself to solve / discuss during the entry – in philosophy, it’s actually valuable to create difficulties that might not be obvious to the casual observer.